Sunday, November 15, 2009

Pro-Abortion Absolutist Obama Will Seek To Mandate Abortion Coverage In ObamaCare

So much for seeking common ground on abortion. President Obama, a pro-abortion absolutist, will seek to remove the Stupak Amendment from ObamaCare.

"Top Obama advisor David Axelrod on Sunday confirmed what pro-life advocates already suspected would happen. He said President Barack Obama will work with congressional Democrats to remove the abortion funding ban the House approved in its version of the government-run health care bill.

Axelrod says that, because the Stupak amendment allegedly goes beyond the status quo under the Hyde amendment (which bans abortion funding under Medicaid), Obama will make sure the amendment is yanked during the conference committee.

That's the part of the legislative process that will occur if and when the Senate approves its own health care bill, which will likely start debate with abortion funding.

"The president has said repeatedly, and he said in his speech to Congress, that he doesn't believe that this bill should change the status quo as it relates to the issue of abortion," Axelrod said today on CNN's State of the Union program.

"This shouldn't be a debate about abortion. And he's going to work with Senate and the House to try and ensure that at the end of the day, the status quo is not changed," he added. "I believe that there are discussions ongoing to how to adjust it accordingly."

Axelrod said that an agreement with ruling Democrats in Congress to remove the ban on taxpayer funding of abortions "can and will be worked through before it reaches his desk."

Axelrod's comments come after Obama's own remarks which made it appear he would favor removing or weakening the Stupak amendment..."


What else would you expect from someone who tolerated infanticide?

Saturday, November 14, 2009

Priest Demonstrates A Suction Abortion

First the video and then some arguments against abortion.



Notice how early the heart is beating, within weeks of conception. I would venture to say that not many abortions occur before the unborn baby's heart has started beating. So if one takes a deliberate action that stops a heart from beating, is that not murder? If the same thing was done to a newborn, is that not murder? If the same thing was done to a mentally handicapped baby, is that not murder? If the same thing was done to an elderly woman, is that not murder? The intentional action that leads to stopping of a heart beat cannot but be murder.

Just because the unborn happen to be located and temporarily dependent on the woman that the unborn baby does not have intrinsic value. A newborn baby is also equally dependent on it's mother only the location has changed. The dependence of an individual and that individual's location is not a foundational factor in determining one's value or humanity. If so, then we could equally justify infanticide and the the murder of the sick, the elderly and the handicapped. Sadly, many use a perverse notion of "compassion" to kill the unborn handicapped.

We must also think of personhood, those qualities essential to our humanity, as non-degreed. This means that one cannot be more or less human. One's humanity or personhood is immediately present after the moment of conception. There is no new biological information added throughout the unborn baby's development, through it's birth, life and death as an adult. To justify the murder of the unborn relies on a purely arbitrary and power based view of what it means to have value or to be a person, and such arguments must be applied to the newborn, the child, and the adult.

These arguments are grounded in the truth that God has a special concern for the fatherless and the unborn epitomize the unwanted.

"Before I formed you in the womb I knew you;
Before you were born I sanctified you..." Jeremiah 1:5

"My frame was not hidden from you
when I was made in the secret place.
When I was woven together in the depths of the earth,

your eyes saw my unformed body.
All the days ordained for me
were written in your book
before one of them came to be.

How precious to me are your thoughts, O God!
How vast is the sum of them!" Psalm 139:15-17


Even Jesus Himself demonstrated a loving concern for the newborn and the child.

"Then they also brought infants to Him that He might touch them; but when the disciples saw it, they rebuked them. But Jesus called them to Him and said, “Let the little children come to Me, and do not forbid them; for of such is the kingdom of God. Assuredly, I say to you, whoever does not receive the kingdom of God as a little child will by no means enter it.” Luke 18:15-17

We honor Jesus by seeking to defend the most helpless class of humanity the world has ever know. To align oneself with someone who is pro-choice is to disobey Jesus.



HT: One News Now

Thursday, November 12, 2009

Premature Baby Girl Survives

Here is an amazing video of a baby girl, Kayleigh, who was born three months early.



Keep in mind that pro-abortion absolutists would call Kayleigh a cancerous growth or parasite while she was in the womb.

Abby Johnson On Huckabee And O'Reilly

Abby Johnson, formally of Planned Parenthood, is doing interviews now.

Here is one from the Mike Huckabee show:



And the Bill O'Reilly Show:

Monday, November 9, 2009

A Call To Adopt The Unborn Orphans In America

I have been greatly affirmed in my call to stand for the unborn after reading Adopted For Life. There is a facebook page that has been created to further this mission. Please join the campaign and invite your friends to so as well.




"Religion that God our Father accepts as pure and faultless is this: to look after orphans and widows in their distress and to keep oneself from being polluted by the world." James 1:27

See how the the unborn have been devalued and assaulted in this country by checking more blogs on abortion here.

Pro-Life Display May Cost Student Body President His Position At California School

Not only are those who claim to be pro-choice really pro-abortion, they also will not tolerate the pro-life view being recognized in public. Sacramento City College's student leaders, Steve Macias and Monica Guzman, may loose their positions for not censoring a pro-life groups display on campus.

"Sacramento City College recently celebrated Constitution Day, an annual celebration of the U.S. Constitution and free speech. The Genocide Awareness Project (GAP), a pro-life organization, requested and was granted a display space at the event. Steve Macias, 19-year-old Associated Student Government president, and Monica Guzman, student affairs commissioner, now risk losing their positions for refusing to kick the pro-life group off campus.

Macias explains the GAP had given a proposal a week prior to being granted the space. The governing body voted unanimously to allow GAP to have a presence on campus. Two days into the event, several pro-abortion groups began protesting the GAP display. That same day, the administration pulled Macias out of class and told him to force GAP to remove its display and leave campus. Macias refused, insisting that GAP had a right to have a presence on campus.

Both Macias and Guzman now face a recall led by several atheist and pro-abortion groups. It is a process in which both could lose their positions of leadership..."

Pro-Abortion Democrats Will Get Abortion Funding Back In ObamaCare

It will be a while before the final version of ObamaCare is voted on again by the House of Representative. Pro-abortion Democrats are expressing confidence that abortion will be covered in the final legislation.



It will be a tragedy if those who voted for the Supak Amendment vote for the final legislation if it contains coverage for abortion. It also confirm that they are not really pro-life.

Sunday, November 8, 2009

Time For Christians To Lead The Way On Adoption


An expansive view of what an orphan is ought to include the unborn as well. Christian families need to step up and lead the way in adopting orphans throughout the world and by pleading with women in crisis pregnancies to give their unwanted child to them. Orphan Sunday is a good way to get the discussion going in your churches and with your friends. Imagine what a national campaign to adopt unborn babies not wanted by their mothers could do?

Saturday, November 7, 2009

ObamaCare Passes With Stupak Amendment But It Is Unclear If It Will Matter

I admit that I am a bit surprised that the Stupak Amendment to strip abortion funding in ObamaCare passed, but ALLAHPUNDIT at Hot Air I think realizes what will happen.

"Update: The vote on the amendment is 236/190 as I write this, which is bad news. Not only is there no guarantee that the amendment will survive the conference committee with the Senate (or a Supreme Court challenge, natch), but this gives pro-life Blue Dogs the cover they need to vote for the final bill. It’s going to pass. Sigh..."


And over at Gateway Pundit there is agreement about this as well.

"More… Betsy added this:

The Stupak amendment is cover for the blue dogs. Somehow the dems will have funding for abortion no matter what they try to tell us.

Agreed."


We have to remember that nearly every Democrat in Congress, including President Obama, is a pro-abortion absolutist. This means that Pelosi and the rest of the Democrats will get abortion coverage in their somehow. The last place to kill this monstrosity is the Senate.

Cross posted at Blue Collar Philosophy

If Stupak Votes For To Make Abortion A Health Care Right, He Is Not Pro-Life

I am watching to see of the claim by some 40 Democrats to be pro-life is believable. I posted earlier that such a thing might be a myth. Now it appears that Stupak and the other "pro-life" Democrats are getting their vote to remove abortion funding in ObamaCare.

"House Democratic leaders will allow an up-or-down vote on an amendment blocking any money in its healthcare overhaul from funding abortions, risking the votes of members who support abortion rights.

Anti-abortion Rep. Bart Stupak (D-Mich.) had told a bleary-eyed Rules committee panel that a deal struck earlier in the day to move forward on the issue was off.

“There was some compromise language from different proposals that we thought would be satisfactory, our understanding was that we had an agreement. Two hours later it was not an agreement,” Stupak said as the clock neared 1 a.m. Saturday.

Stupak, flanked by a bipartisan coterie of abortion opponents, argued for consideration of their amendment that explicitiy prohibits federal funding of abortions under the Democrats' healthcare bill before the Speaker's select committee.

Liberals on the committee threatened to vote against the final healthcare bill if it included Stupak’s language, warning that it would be a return to the days of back-alley abortions..."


Allowing this vote may be to call the bluff of these "pro-life Democrats". At the end of the day if the amendment to remove abortion funding fails and these 40 some Democrats still vote for ObamaCare and enshrine abortion as a health care right, then they are not pro-life.

HT: Hot Air

Friday, November 6, 2009

What Will Governor Meg Whitman Mean For Abortion In California?

I really do not want a Democrat to be the next Governor of California, but if Meg Whitman is a pro-abortion absolutist, then I may not vote for a Governor in 2010. When Feminists For Choice praise Whitman for her views on abortion, that sends red flags up all over the place.

"In doing some research on our candidates for the Governor of California, I began to ponder over the direction of the Republican party, particularly on social issues. Two of my very close friends, who happen to be capital R-republicans, attended John McCain’s endorsement of Republican candidate Meg Whitman this past week in Orange County. They rushed home to give me the news they knew I wanted. She’s pro-choice and proud of it!

I’ll be the first to admit that the news excited me. Despite my distaste with the core objectives of the Republican party, it was great to hear an intelligent and independent woman standing up to a crowd of anti-choice supporters to self-identify as a pro-choice advocate.

And honestly, that’s exactly what Meg Whitman is. A strong, independent, thought-provoking woman who stands as a role model for hard working and dedicated women all over the globe. Meg Whitman is one of only seven women to be consistently ranked among the world’s most influential people by Time Magazine. The Wall Street Journal named her one of the “50 Women to Watch” in 2005; Fortune ranked her the most powerful woman in business in 2004 and 2005; and BusinessWeek has included her on its list of the 25 most powerful business managers every year since 2000..."


Whitman is clearly not voicing her views on the issue from her website as far as I can tell. She may try and slit the difference on social issues by opposing gay marriage, but I think the murder of unborn babies ought to take a prima facie precedent in this case.

Cross posted at Blue Collar Philosophy.

Companies To Boycott Since They Give To Planned Parenthood

I am not always convinced that boycotts work well unless there are active protests outside a specific location. But in case you want to avoid your money going to Planned Parenthood, Life Site News has posted some information.

"Life Decisions International (LDI) has released a revised edition of The Boycott List, which identifies corporations that are boycott targets due to their support of Planned Parenthood, the world's primary abortion-advocacy group.

"As a direct result of the commitment, action and prayers of pro-family people, at least 231 corporations have stopped funding Planned Parenthood," said LDI Chairman Thomas C. Strobhar. It is estimated that the boycott has cost Planned Parenthood more than $40 million since the Corporate Funding Project (CFP) began nearly 17 years ago. "This should serve as a testament to those who thought it impossible to change corporate philanthropic behavior."

New boycott targets, appearing on the pre-Christmas 2009 edition of The Boycott List, include Buffalo Wild Wings (restaurants), Estée Lauder (cosmetics/personal care products), Computer Sciences Corporation (information technology), and United Parcel Service (shipping services).

Corporations continuing as boycott targets from the previously released Boycott List include eBay (Pay {Pal, etc.), AlphaGraphics, Wells Fargo (including Wachovia), Nike, Time Warner (HBO, AOL, etc.), Bank of America, Walt Disney, Johnson & Johnson, Lost Arrow (Patagonia, etc.), Chevron, and Nationwide Insurance, and Sonic (restaurants), among others..."

An Activist Judge In Illinois Stops Parental Notification

I wonder how parents are reacting to an activist judge's arrogance in assuming that he knows what is better for their daughters in regards to abortion?

"A state judge blocked enforcement of a parental notification law on abortion just hours after a state board approved letting it go into effect. The law would allow parents the right to know when their teenager daughter is considering having an abortion and give them 48 hours to help her find alternatives.

Parents in Illinois have waited for 15 years for a law to go into effect and, earlier Wednesday, a vote from the Illinois' Medical Disciplinary Board made it appear that would happen.

The Illinois legislature approved the law in the 1990s, but it has been held up in court waiting for the Illinois Supreme Court to issue the rules guiding the law's implementation.

After the court did its job, state officials blocked enforcement of the law with a 90-day grace period for abortion centers to became aware of it -- even though similar laws have been on the books in other states for decades.

The board met in Chicago on Wednesday and decided not to extend the grace period further that the Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation put in place..."

Tuesday, November 3, 2009

Abortion Advocates Are Living In The Dark Ages Of Prenatal Medicine

Not only is Planned Parenthood, pro-abortion absolutists, and anyone who claims to be pro-choice basing their views on the Dark Ages of prenatal medicine, they are also wanting women to kill their unborn child in total ignorance about the life inside them. This is done by opposing giving women facts about their unborn child or having them view an ultrasound of their baby. It is a lot easier to kill "it" when the mother is denied the truth about what "it" is, namely her unborn boy or girl with a heart beat. Imagine what it might do if the woman about to abort her child sees her baby's heart beat for the first time? This seems to explain the resignation of Abby Johnson at a Texas Planned Parenthood facility.

Here is an ultrasound of my twin boys at about 25 weeks.



An abortion would kill them, plan and simple. You can notice the features of their body and they are developing every second. It is time for pro-abortion absolutists to come out of the Dark Ages in which they are basing their morally depraved and backward views on. Come into the modern era and stop denying the truth about the unborn.

Monday, November 2, 2009

Abby Johnson Resigns From Planned Parenthood After Seeing An Abortion Ultrasound

The pro-abortion absolutists who are behind Planned Parenthood and controlling the Democratic Party's Culture of Death, are basing their policies on the Dark Ages of prenatal medicine. Thankfully a technology, like ultrasounds, can give us a window into the unborn baby's life. Seeing a baby killed was enough to cause Abby Johnson to leave Planned Parenthood.



HT: Gateway Pundit